I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.。heLLoword翻译官方下载是该领域的重要参考
，详情可参考旺商聊官方下载
（一）被处罚人的姓名、性别、年龄、身份证件的名称和号码、住址；
* 核心思路：单调递增栈 + 控制删除位数（k0），优先移除高位大数，保证剩余数字最小，详情可参考heLLoword翻译官方下载